Looking at Autism from an objective point of view, there are many things that become apparent when the facts are analyzed. However the down fall comes when we fail to analyze the points of segregation that restrict us from making accurate judgements on those facts, and with it, we continue to do research on things that should be painfully clear if  we just took the time to connect some ideas.

If genes are constantly expressing themselves in the early stages of expansion, and things like life and experience affect us biologically, wouldn’t it be logical to assume that our experience would have an impact on our gene expression during times of key growth (at the advanced evolved state)? Wouldn’t the idea of even evolving to this point and allowing us to choose our own path be a viable believable option from an evolution stand point?

In Richard Dawkins book, The Gods Delusion, he mentions a shared theory that religion is the by-product of something else entirely.  And from a psychological point of view I am going to have to agree. Looking at the facts, religion spontaneously arose in every quadrant of the planet at around the same time. This points to a universal variable that for the most part remained consistent and steadfast all across the evolutionary scope of human development.

Humans are among the only species that have adapted monogamy as a way of life, in comparison, only 3 percent of the animal kingdom has adopted a similar lifestyle. The contrast of differential actually lies in the environment in which we live.

At the very core of evolution lies the fundamental component of movement, it allows everything that is governed within evolutions standard to be dynamic and function with a sense of worth and direction. Movement is the core variable in which life becomes complex, movement allows  evolution to be dynamic in its scope and above all, without it, we simply wouldn’t exist. Even our thoughts are based on the amount of movement and stimulus that we receive, for without movement, the stimulus that we seek as individuals would also be stagnant and therefore the variables that drive evolution would also be stagnant, essentially our thoughts are the movement and therefore the physical aspect of movement is the product cycle of our intent to increase our level of stimulus and advance the path of evolution onward and upward.

Evolution as a general rule always tries to move in an upward manner through adaptation. It’s the one reason why everything around us becomes more complex with time as the goal of evolution is to integrate all stimuli no matter what the cost. If there was no way to move up and outward then life would stay stagnant and probably be very boring. Extreme instances of stimulus increases life’s capacity to deal with it and hence forms a co-evolution of sorts, but this only really works in the early growth stages of development, when androgen levels are high and the brain is dynamic and versatile.